The nomination of Emil Bove, former lawyer to Donald Trump, has ignited fierce opposition as 900 Justice Department alumni urged the Senate to reject his appointment to the federal appeals court. Democrats staged a dramatic walkout during the Judiciary Committee vote, calling Bove’s record “egregious” and his ethics into question.
Bove, who represented Trump in his hush-money trial and pressured prosecutors to drop cases, faces allegations of undermining the rule of law. Critics accuse him of abusing power, while Republicans advance his nomination despite bipartisan backlash.
- 900+ former DOJ employees oppose Emil Bove’s appellate court nomination, citing his history of pressuring prosecutors to drop cases and allegedly encouraging defiance of court orders.
- Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats staged a walkout during the vote, calling the proceeding a “kangaroo court” and denouncing Bove as “supremely unqualified” for the judiciary.
- Republicans advanced Bove’s nomination despite protests, marking the first time a U.S. president nominated his former criminal defense attorney for a lifetime federal judgeship.
Community Reactions
- 匿名エビ (2025-07-18)
Can we talk about how wild it is to nominate your own lawyer? Like, zero shame. The Third Circuit deserves better.
- 匿名クルトン (2025-07-18)
It’s Trump’s world—we’re just living in it. Corruption? Nah, just 'loyalty rewards.' 🙄
- 匿名クルトン (2025-07-18)
- 匿名ナッツ (2025-07-18)
Bove’s a bulldog—exactly what the judiciary needs. Trump picked him because he gets results. Cry about it.
- 匿名ベーコン (2025-07-18)
'Gets results'? More like tramples norms. Whistleblowers don’t lie about profanity-laced rants defying court orders.
- 匿名ベーコン (2025-07-18)
- 匿名レタス (2025-07-18)
Democrats walking out is performative. If they really cared, they’d stay and fight instead of grandstanding. 🎭
Who is Emil Bove? Trump’s ex-lawyer facing fire for 3rd Circuit nomination
Emil Bove, a former federal prosecutor turned Trump’s personal attorney, has become the center of a judicial storm. The nominee for the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals previously represented Trump in his New York criminal trial involving hush money payments to Stormy Daniels. Before joining Trump’s legal team in 2023, Bove spent a decade as an assistant U.S. attorney in Manhattan.
His DOJ tenure has come under scrutiny after whistleblowers revealed he pressured prosecutors to drop cases against political allies and allegedly advised ignoring court orders on deportations. More than 900 Justice Department alumni have signed letters opposing his confirmation, calling his conduct “dangerously politicized.”







Career timeline controversy
- 2011-2021: Assistant U.S. Attorney, SDNY
- 2023-2025: Trump’s lead counsel in NY criminal case
- May 2024: Reportedly pressured DOJ to drop Eric Adams corruption case
- June 2025: Whistleblower alleges deportation order defiance
Why did Democrats walk out? The shocking Senate Judiciary protest explained


The Senate Judiciary Committee descended into chaos when all Democratic members staged an unprecedented walkout during Bove’s confirmation vote. Senator Richard Blumenthal called the proceedings a “kangaroo court” after Chairman Chuck Grassley refused to hear testimony from whistleblower Erez Reuveni, who claims Bove urged DOJ attorneys to defy court orders.
Eleven prosecutors had previously resigned when Bove allegedly intervened in the Eric Adams case. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse noted, “This isn’t advice and consent – it’s obstruction and complicity.” Republicans proceeded with the vote without Democratic participation, advancing Bove’s nomination to the full Senate.
What’s in the DOJ whistleblower complaint against Bove?
The complaint filed by former DOJ attorney Reuveni contains explosive allegations about Bove’s conduct at Justice:


| Allegation | Impact |
|---|---|
| Suggested ignoring court orders on Venezuelan deportations | 11 attorney resignations |
| Called immigration judges “activist clowns” | 75+ retired judges protest |
| Pressured NYC prosecutors to drop Adams case | Case later dismissed |






Will Bove’s nomination pass the full Senate? GOP defections to watch
With Republicans holding a 51-49 majority, Bove can afford only one defection. Several GOP senators have expressed reservations:
- Thom Tillis (NC): Called Martin nomination “bridge too far” in 2024
- Lisa Murkowski (AK): Voted against prior Trump judicial picks
- Susan Collins (ME): Hasn’t committed, awaiting ABA rating
The American Bar Association typically rates nominees before Senate votes. Its evaluation of Bove – expected next week – could prove decisive. Historically, “Not Qualified” ratings have sunk nominations, as occurred with Jeff Mateer in 2017.
How does Bove compare to other controversial judicial nominees?
Modern judicial confirmations have seen several explosive battles, but Bove stands out for multiple red flags:
| Nominee | Controversy | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Brett Kavanaugh (2018) | Sexual assault allegations | Confirmed 50-48 |
| Jeff Mateer (2017) | “Transgender trend” comments | Withdrawn |
| Emil Bove (2025) | Whistleblower claims, political interference | Pending |






What happens if Bove becomes a judge? Legal experts weigh in
Constitutional scholars warn Bove’s confirmation could erode judicial independence:
- Potential recusal issues in Trump-related cases
- Risk of political decision-making on immigration rulings
- Undermining of judicial deference to colleagues’ orders


The 3rd Circuit handles appeals from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware and the Virgin Islands. Its docket includes high-profile cases about voting rights, pharmaceutical regulations, and immigration policies – all areas where Bove’s alleged willingness to ignore judicial orders could prove problematic.
Bove’s nomination is a joke 🤡. 900 DOJ alumni can’t all be wrong. This guy’s track record screams ‘political enforcer,’ not ‘impartial judge.’
Exactly! The Adams case alone should disqualify him. DOJ morale tanked because of his blatant quid pro quo nonsense.
Democrats walking out is performative. If they really cared, they’d stay and fight instead of grandstanding. 🎭
Bove’s a bulldog—exactly what the judiciary needs. Trump picked him because he gets results. Cry about it.
‘Gets results’? More like tramples norms. Whistleblowers don’t lie about profanity-laced rants defying court orders.
Can we talk about how wild it is to nominate your own lawyer? Like, zero shame. The Third Circuit deserves better.
It’s Trump’s world—we’re just living in it. Corruption? Nah, just ‘loyalty rewards.’ 🙄