The striker debate at Chelsea has intensified as Liam Delap and Nicolas Jackson vie for the starting role amid external transfer drama. While Delap showcased his potential in the Club World Cup, Jackson faces uncertainty after AC Milan’s approach and a shocking £100m valuation.

Manchester United’s surprise enquiry for Jackson adds another layer to this high-stakes competition, leaving manager Enzo Maresca with a tactical dilemma. Both forwards bring contrasting strengths, but Delap’s recent form might give him the edge.

With Chelsea demanding record fees for Jackson and Delap seizing his opportunities, the battle for the number nine spot could define their season.

Liam Delap vs Nicolas Jackson: Who should start for Chelsea after Manchester United enquiry and £100m price tag drama?

Why Chelsea splashed £30m on Liam Delap despite having Nicolas Jackson

Chelsea’s acquisition of Liam Delap for £30m from Ipswich Town raised eyebrows given they already had Nicolas Jackson as their primary striker. Delap scored 12 goals last season for a relegated Ipswich side, while Jackson managed just 10 for Chelsea. The Blues clearly saw potential in Delap that warranted the investment, especially considering his age (22) and the fact he signed a six-year deal.

Delap represents a different profile than Jackson – more physical, better in the air, and with a more natural striker’s instinct. Chelsea needed this alternative option up front.

But isn’t £30m a lot for someone who hasn’t proven himself at the highest level yet? Jackson at least has Premier League experience.

How Delap’s reunion with Cole Palmer could spark Chelsea’s attack

One of the key factors in Delap choosing Chelsea was the chance to reunite with former Manchester City teammate Cole Palmer. The pair came through City’s academy together and have an established understanding. Last season at Ipswich, Delap showed he thrives when paired with creative wingers, while Palmer demonstrated his ability to create chances at Chelsea.

This partnership could be gold for Chelsea. Palmer knows exactly how to find Delap’s runs, and Delap understands Palmer’s creative tendencies. It’s a match made in football heaven.

Remember though, chemistry at youth level doesn’t always translate to senior football. The Premier League is a whole different beast.

Why Manchester United missed out on Delap despite late enquiry

Manchester United’s shock enquiry for a Chelsea player (rumored to be Jackson) came too late to influence the Delap transfer situation. The young striker had already chosen Chelsea due to their Champions League qualification, something United failed to achieve after their Europa League final loss to Tottenham. United’s instability and lack of European football next season made Chelsea the more attractive option, despite their historical interest in Delap.

The Europa League final domino effect

Had United won in Bilbao, they would have secured Champions League football and possibly changed Delap’s decision. Instead, their defeat confirmed another season of rebuilding under Erik ten Hag, while Chelsea could offer immediate top-level European competition.

Is Nicolas Jackson really worth £100m? Analyzing Chelsea’s valuation

Chelsea’s reported £100m asking price for Nicolas Jackson after AC Milan’s approach has baffled many observers. While the Senegalese forward shows flashes of brilliance, his inconsistency and wastefulness in front of goal don’t justify such an astronomical figure. This inflated valuation seems more like a deterrent than a genuine price tag.

The £100m tag is Chelsea playing hardball. They know Jackson still has potential, and they don’t want to sell unless it’s for silly money.

But isn’t this counterproductive? If they rate Delap higher, why put such a huge price on Jackson? It might discourage potential buyers completely.

Tactical breakdown: How Delap compares to Jackson in key areas

Comparing the two strikers reveals contrasting profiles that could complement each other if used correctly:

• Physicality: Delap (6’1″) offers more aerial threat than Jackson (5’11”)
• Hold-up play: Delap’s experience as a target man gives him an edge
• Pace: Jackson is quicker over short distances
• Link-up play: Both are strong but in different ways
• Finishing: Delap had better conversion rate last season despite playing for a weaker team

Predicted Chelsea starting XI: Can Delap and Jackson play together?

Enzo Maresca faces an interesting selection dilemma. While conventional wisdom suggests one striker systems are preferred in modern football, Chelsea’s investment in both players might necessitate finding a way to accommodate both. Possible solutions include:

• Using Delap as a traditional #9 with Jackson in a wider forward role
• Alternating based on opposition with Jackson’s pace better suited against high lines
• Employing a 3-5-2 system that gets both on the pitch

The smart money is on Delap starting as the main striker with Jackson being used situationally. Delap’s all-round game offers more to Chelsea’s system.

But Jackson’s pace could be devastating off the bench against tired defenses. Maybe this competition will bring out the best in both!