MENU

Emil Bove nomination controversy heats up as Democrats walk out — who is Trump’s former lawyer and why are 900 DOJ alumni protesting his judgeship?

Emil Bove nomination controversy heats up as Democrats walk out — who is Trump’s former lawyer and why are 900 DOJ alumni protesting his judgeship?

The nomination of Emil Bove, former lawyer to Donald Trump, has ignited fierce opposition as 900 Justice Department alumni urged the Senate to reject his appointment to the federal appeals court. Democrats staged a dramatic walkout during the Judiciary Committee vote, calling Bove’s record “egregious” and his ethics into question.

Bove, who represented Trump in his hush-money trial and pressured prosecutors to drop cases, faces allegations of undermining the rule of law. Critics accuse him of abusing power, while Republicans advance his nomination despite bipartisan backlash.

Summary
  • 900+ former DOJ employees oppose Emil Bove’s appellate court nomination, citing his history of pressuring prosecutors to drop cases and allegedly encouraging defiance of court orders.
  • Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats staged a walkout during the vote, calling the proceeding a “kangaroo court” and denouncing Bove as “supremely unqualified” for the judiciary.
  • Republicans advanced Bove’s nomination despite protests, marking the first time a U.S. president nominated his former criminal defense attorney for a lifetime federal judgeship.

Community Reactions

  • 匿名エビ (2025-07-18)

    Can we talk about how wild it is to nominate your own lawyer? Like, zero shame. The Third Circuit deserves better.

    • 匿名クルトン (2025-07-18)

      It’s Trump’s world—we’re just living in it. Corruption? Nah, just 'loyalty rewards.' 🙄

  • 匿名ナッツ (2025-07-18)

    Bove’s a bulldog—exactly what the judiciary needs. Trump picked him because he gets results. Cry about it.

    • 匿名ベーコン (2025-07-18)

      'Gets results'? More like tramples norms. Whistleblowers don’t lie about profanity-laced rants defying court orders.

  • 匿名レタス (2025-07-18)

    Democrats walking out is performative. If they really cared, they’d stay and fight instead of grandstanding. 🎭

Who is Emil Bove? Trump’s ex-lawyer facing fire for 3rd Circuit nomination

Emil Bove attending Trump's trial
Source: usatoday.com

Emil Bove, a former federal prosecutor turned Trump’s personal attorney, has become the center of a judicial storm. The nominee for the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals previously represented Trump in his New York criminal trial involving hush money payments to Stormy Daniels. Before joining Trump’s legal team in 2023, Bove spent a decade as an assistant U.S. attorney in Manhattan.

His DOJ tenure has come under scrutiny after whistleblowers revealed he pressured prosecutors to drop cases against political allies and allegedly advised ignoring court orders on deportations. More than 900 Justice Department alumni have signed letters opposing his confirmation, calling his conduct “dangerously politicized.”

Ms. Tomato, notice how this mirrors the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation battle? When personal lawyers become judges, it creates perceptions of indebtedness to their former clients.
But Mr. Lettuce, doesn’t every president appoint allies? Obama appointed his White House counsel to the DC Circuit.
Key difference – Bove actively represented Trump in criminal matters. That’s first-degree cronyism, not just professional networking.

Career timeline controversy

  • 2011-2021: Assistant U.S. Attorney, SDNY
  • 2023-2025: Trump’s lead counsel in NY criminal case
  • May 2024: Reportedly pressured DOJ to drop Eric Adams corruption case
  • June 2025: Whistleblower alleges deportation order defiance

Why did Democrats walk out? The shocking Senate Judiciary protest explained

Senate Judiciary Committee hearing
Source: reuters.com

The Senate Judiciary Committee descended into chaos when all Democratic members staged an unprecedented walkout during Bove’s confirmation vote. Senator Richard Blumenthal called the proceedings a “kangaroo court” after Chairman Chuck Grassley refused to hear testimony from whistleblower Erez Reuveni, who claims Bove urged DOJ attorneys to defy court orders.

Eleven prosecutors had previously resigned when Bove allegedly intervened in the Eric Adams case. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse noted, “This isn’t advice and consent – it’s obstruction and complicity.” Republicans proceeded with the vote without Democratic participation, advancing Bove’s nomination to the full Senate.

What’s in the DOJ whistleblower complaint against Bove?

The complaint filed by former DOJ attorney Reuveni contains explosive allegations about Bove’s conduct at Justice:

DOJ headquarters
Source: washingtonpost.com
AllegationImpact
Suggested ignoring court orders on Venezuelan deportations11 attorney resignations
Called immigration judges “activist clowns”75+ retired judges protest
Pressured NYC prosecutors to drop Adams caseCase later dismissed

The complaint says he used phrase “fucking judges” – can someone with that attitude really be impartial?
Precisely why 75 retired judges – including Republicans – called this nomination “an affront to judicial independence.” Remember when Trump attacked “so-called judges”? This is institutionalizing that mindset.

Will Bove’s nomination pass the full Senate? GOP defections to watch

With Republicans holding a 51-49 majority, Bove can afford only one defection. Several GOP senators have expressed reservations:

  • Thom Tillis (NC): Called Martin nomination “bridge too far” in 2024
  • Lisa Murkowski (AK): Voted against prior Trump judicial picks
  • Susan Collins (ME): Hasn’t committed, awaiting ABA rating

The American Bar Association typically rates nominees before Senate votes. Its evaluation of Bove – expected next week – could prove decisive. Historically, “Not Qualified” ratings have sunk nominations, as occurred with Jeff Mateer in 2017.

How does Bove compare to other controversial judicial nominees?

Modern judicial confirmations have seen several explosive battles, but Bove stands out for multiple red flags:

Judicial nominee comparisons
Source: yahoo.com
NomineeControversyOutcome
Brett Kavanaugh (2018)Sexual assault allegationsConfirmed 50-48
Jeff Mateer (2017)“Transgender trend” commentsWithdrawn
Emil Bove (2025)Whistleblower claims, political interferencePending

Kavanaugh got confirmed despite assault allegations – why wouldn’t Republicans stand by Bove?
Different stakes – Kavanaugh was replacing swing vote Kennedy on SCOTUS. Bove’s just one appellate judge, and defying court orders strikes at judiciary’s core authority. Even Trump allies might balk at that precedent.

What happens if Bove becomes a judge? Legal experts weigh in

Constitutional scholars warn Bove’s confirmation could erode judicial independence:

  • Potential recusal issues in Trump-related cases
  • Risk of political decision-making on immigration rulings
  • Undermining of judicial deference to colleagues’ orders
3rd Circuit courthouse
Source: union-bulletin.com

The 3rd Circuit handles appeals from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware and the Virgin Islands. Its docket includes high-profile cases about voting rights, pharmaceutical regulations, and immigration policies – all areas where Bove’s alleged willingness to ignore judicial orders could prove problematic.

このトレンド記事を共有する
通知設定
通知する
guest
7 Comments
古い
新着 高評価
引用コメント
全てのコメントを表示
匿名タマゴ
匿名タマゴ
2025-07-18

Bove’s nomination is a joke 🤡. 900 DOJ alumni can’t all be wrong. This guy’s track record screams ‘political enforcer,’ not ‘impartial judge.’

匿名ハム
匿名ハム
2025-07-18
リプライ:  匿名タマゴ

Exactly! The Adams case alone should disqualify him. DOJ morale tanked because of his blatant quid pro quo nonsense.

匿名レタス
匿名レタス
2025-07-18

Democrats walking out is performative. If they really cared, they’d stay and fight instead of grandstanding. 🎭

匿名ナッツ
匿名ナッツ
2025-07-18

Bove’s a bulldog—exactly what the judiciary needs. Trump picked him because he gets results. Cry about it.

匿名ベーコン
匿名ベーコン
2025-07-18
リプライ:  匿名ナッツ

‘Gets results’? More like tramples norms. Whistleblowers don’t lie about profanity-laced rants defying court orders.

匿名エビ
匿名エビ
2025-07-18

Can we talk about how wild it is to nominate your own lawyer? Like, zero shame. The Third Circuit deserves better.

匿名クルトン
匿名クルトン
2025-07-18
リプライ:  匿名エビ

It’s Trump’s world—we’re just living in it. Corruption? Nah, just ‘loyalty rewards.’ 🙄

TOC